logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

Management Innovation: a processual approach through practices and bundles of practices

The Covid-19 crisis has stimulated the adoption of a number of managerial innovations, says Caroline Mattelin-Pierrard. She observes that one innovation – ‘the liberated company’ – provides opportunities for an organisation to develop greater agility and seems to have been adopted as a response to forced distancing.

The liberated company (or Holacracy) has been defined as an “organisational form in which employees have complete freedom and responsibility to take actions that they, not their managers, decide are best” (Getz, 2009, p. 34).

Caroline and her colleagues have been analysing managerial innovation adoption through a study based on the narratives of two specific cases.

The findings are consistent with the Track “Outcomes and performance of managerial innovation” at the 2021 R&D Management conference, of which Caroline was co-chair.

The study is based on the three phases of the process of managerial innovation adoption:

  • – initiation and decision
  • – implementation
  • – routinisation
Caroline Mattelin-Pierrard
Caroline Mattelin-Pierrard

Timing important for successful adoption of change

A processual approach makes it possible to observe how managerial practices (setting goals and procedures, meeting demands from different stakeholders, etc…) are refined, stabilised and consolidated over time through multiple negotiations, in particular by the means of bundles of practices (specific configurations of consistent practices).

The study reveals that some practices (and/or bundles of practices) are a prerequisite for the implementation of other practices (and/or bundles of practices). It is therefore not merely a question of thinking about the internal coherence of bundles of practices, but also about the consistence of their adoption across time. As a result, enabling practices (support and communication bundles) give employees the capacity to act and support the implementation of new processes (empowerment bundle). For example, to become fully autonomous an employee may need a supportive manager acting like a coach before feeling comfortable in making decisions. Right to make mistakes is also one of the preconditions.

This distinction enriches the understanding of the adoption process of a managerial innovation and allows us to think about the complementarity between the managerial practices of the liberated company.

If the implementation phase is key, since it is the most likely to generate resistance and encounter obstacles in the organisation (Birkinshaw et al., 2008), the routinisation phase deserves a particular attention. For example, where individuals are uncertain use of an innovation, adoption may be contingent on a prior decision by the organisation (Rogers, 1995), rejection could occur further in the process.

To prevent such rejection, the enabling practice could favour the sustainability of the adoption. It is therefore important to consider the whole process, as the content of the previous phases may be a factor that favours the success of the following phases (Khosravi et al., 2019).

The routinisation phase could crystallise all the tensions that have been ignored, particularly due to the inconsistent adoption of practices (in terms of bundles or temporality). Beyond the adoption decision, the consistence of the whole process is therefore strategic and should be planned.

Could tensions be resolved through better timing?

The processual approach (Langley et al., 2013) highlights the importance of temporality and context (the history and culture of organisations), political processes, power plays and decision-making, and challenges the view that strategy formation is essentially a conceptual process.

This represents a promising analytical framework (Bocquet et al., 2019; Damanpour et al., 2018).

As an extension of our research, this would highlight whether a different temporal arrangement of managerial practices could have a positive effect in avoiding the tensions (e.g. in terms of normative pressure) identified elsewhere in the literature (e.g. Picard & Islam, 2020).

Managerial and organisational innovation effects need further explorations, especially regarding social ones.

Useful background to the field of Managerial Innovation

For a newcomer,  I would like to recommend the following two recent references which provide a clear overview of managerial and organisational innovation literature, past researches and some ideas for future researches:

Damanpour, F. (2020). Organizational Innovation: Theory, Research, and Direction. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Khosravi, P., Newton, C. & Rezvani, A. (2019). Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research. European Management Journal, 37(6), 694-707.

Vaccaro, I. G., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. (2013). Management innovation in action: The case of self-managing teams. In Handbook of organizational and managerial innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Caroline Mattelin-Pierrard is associate professor at University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France. She completed is PhD at University Savoie Mont Blanc where she is also associate researcher. Her research focus on organisational and managerial innovations. More specifically, she is interested in new organisations, in particular the liberated company (or Holacracy), and approaches managerial innovation from the perspective of responsible management (from its antecedents to its effects).

Read Caroline’s paper:

Source: Mattelin-Pierrard C., Battistelli M., Dubey A.S., 2020, Libération d’entreprises et pratiques managériales : quelle(s) temporalité(s) d’adoption ?, 29th Congress of the Association International de Management Stratégique (AIMS), Online, 3-5 June.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343737055_Liberation_d’entreprises_et_pratiques_manageriales_quelles_temporalites_d’adoption (Currently in French, it will soon be translated into English.)

Find Caroline on Twitter: @carolyne741, LinkedIn and ResearchGate

Management Innovation
Previous PostIs Open Innovation the way to tackle the most...
Next PostHow can Entrepreneurship Ecosystems support t...
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
View our newsletter archive
Theme Editor Blogs
  • Digital disruption in the lab: The case for R&D digitalization in chemicals – a review
  • Accelerating product development: the tools you need now – a review
  • Using good practice R&D management to create new innovations in malodour control
Resources
  • Innovation Management: Learning for the experiences of companies in European countries
  • How to write and publish your research
  • Top 20 Innovation Blogs of 2016
Tools
  • Paul Barrett
    Tools support objective discussion of portfolio strategy
    Paul Barrett is part of a RADMA working group providing a selection of recommended...
  • Kano model of product or service features 2
    Improving Product Features: When is More Less?
    Different types of feature have different effects on customer satisfaction - analysis by Quality...
  • Paired comparison
    Techniques for Effective Prioritisation
    Gut feeling may be a valid basis for making decisions about your personal life...
  • Green Check Your Idea
    “Green Check Your Idea” – assess the environmental impact of innovation ideas
    The Green Check Your Idea tool helps innovation managers prepare an initial assessment of...
  • Most useful R&D Management tools survey
    Most useful tools for R&D Management
    Ask which are the most useful tools for R&D Management and you will find...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.