logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

Assessing Risks in R&D projects

All R&D projects face uncertainties and it is as well to face them at the start of a project and lay plans for dealing with them. Managers may simply want to keep an eye on some of them, but the more significant ones may merit a side project to pick off the risky bits early on, and to prepare a “Plan B” if things turn out badly. Making up a “Risk Register” at the beginning of an R&D project obviously makes a lot of sense.

However, risk assessment is not easy. There are some helpful tools like Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), but it all relies on team members being able and willing to identify the risks. Technical experts are notoriously optimistic about their own work and nobody likes to be branded as a pessimist, especially in a team context.

An old but valuable paper by Keiser, Halman and Song describes a helpful process.

The two key elements are, first, that team members should be questioned separately by an outsider and their views presented to a meeting anonymously. This helps people to take the process seriously and overcomes the embarrassment of appearing to doubt somebody else’s capabilities.Risk management

Second, the investigator poses the questions in a reverse sense. Instead of being asked to comment on the risk that, say, “The power output will fall short of requirements” the questioner suggests: “the power output will be adequate”.

The authors suggest that people tend to react to a positive statement by thinking “Well, so they say, but I’m not so sure”, so reverse questioning tends to bring out concerns more readily.

Read the full paper:

From experience: applying the risk diagnosing methodology, Keizer, J. A., Halman, J. I. M. and Song, M., Journal of Product Innovation Management 2002

Recommended by and post by Rick Mitchell.

J. A. KeizerJ. I. M. HalmanM. SongRisk management
Previous PostHave you ever measured your roadmapping perfo...
Next PostFundamentals of technology roadmapping
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
View our newsletter archive
Theme Editor Blogs
  • Loading and Turbulence in R&D: Is there a Reynolds Number?
  • John Shave’s “Revenue Replacement Rule”
  • How end user focus determines clock speed for R&D programmes
Resources
  • Portfolio Management techniques
Tools
  • Creating compelling objectives to deliver strategic growth platforms
    Leaders want their teams to think beyond the day-to-day and create thriving visions for...
  • Green Check Your Idea
    “Green Check Your Idea” – assess the environmental impact of innovation ideas
    The Green Check Your Idea tool helps innovation managers prepare an initial assessment of...
  • FEMA
    Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
    To fail fast can save enormous waste later in the product lifecycle. Failure Mode...
  • Paul Barrett
    Tools support objective discussion of portfolio strategy
    Paul Barrett is part of a RADMA working group providing a selection of recommended...
  • Paired comparison
    Techniques for Effective Prioritisation
    Gut feeling may be a valid basis for making decisions about your personal life...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.