logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

Experimenting in the Unknown: Lessons from The Manhattan Project

The Manhattan project built the first implosion-type fission bomb when much of the necessary information and theory were not available. Studying this project revealed interesting insights and some lessons on how to (and how not to) approach such investigations, offering potential interest both from an historical and technical point of view and for the observations about experimental method.

Experimenting in the Unknown: Lessons from The Manhattan Project –  Thomas Gillier and Sylvain Lenfle

Manhattan ProjectThe first and most important characteristic of the Manhattan case was the nearly complete lack of knowledge regarding the processes of implosion. Nobody had ever envisioned an implosion weapon, and therefore there were no theories on how one worked.

Scientists and engineers were charged with answering new questions, typically regarding hydrodynamics of implosion.

In this situation, the role of early experimentation was simply to test things and see what happened. These tests were not designed to discriminate hypotheses but to gain initial understanding of the basic processes at play.

The process was simultaneous – looking at results from the first crude experiments generated hypotheses that led simultaneously to modifying the test, formulating theoretical recommendations and creating new experiments. This characterizes the continuous interaction of theory and experimental testing that progressively led to better understanding of the processes and eventually, a bomb design.

However, it was nearly impossible to identify which one came first. The authors compare the experience of the Manhattan project with the accepted theories of how to manage experimentation, notably those of Thomke, and show how they should be extended for cases of great uncertainty. The results are summarised in a helpful table.

Accessing this article

Experimenting in the Unknown: Lessons from The Manhattan Project THOMAS GILLIER and SYLVAIN LENFLE European Management Review, Vol. 16, 449–469, (2019)

This article is available as a pdf at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292680638_Experimenting_in_the_unknown_lessons_from_the_Manhattan_project

Review by

Thomas Gillier, Grenoble École de Management, Department of Technology Management and Strategy

Sylvain LenfleThomas Gillier
Previous PostYou have a strategy whether you like it or no...
Next PostSelection of good papers from Technovation
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
View our newsletter archive
Theme Editor Blogs
  • Digital disruption in the lab: The case for R&D digitalization in chemicals – a review
  • Accelerating product development: the tools you need now – a review
  • Using good practice R&D management to create new innovations in malodour control
Resources
  • Innovation Management: Learning for the experiences of companies in European countries
  • Top 20 Innovation Blogs of 2016
  • How to write and publish your research
Tools
  • Kano model of product or service features 2
    Improving Product Features: When is More Less?
    Different types of feature have different effects on customer satisfaction - analysis by Quality...
  • 'How to' statements
    A useful tool in creative problem solving is the ‘how to’ statement which provides...
  • portfolio tools
    Portfolio management tools and approaches
    The aim of portfolio management is to ensure that a sensible set of innovation...
  • Creating compelling objectives to deliver strategic growth platforms
    Leaders want their teams to think beyond the day-to-day and create thriving visions for...
  • Valuing and comparing small portfolios
    Many of the tools used in valuing and selecting projects are only really applicable...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.