Skip to content
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
  • Home
  • About
    • About R&D Today
    • Contributors
    • R&D Publications
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Themes
    • R&D Management
      • Rationale for key themes
      • Ideation and creativity in R&D
      • Managing international R&D
      • Managing the R&D pipeline
      • Open Innovation
      • Roadmapping
      • Technology Strategy
    • Special Features
      • Innovation for a Sustainable Future
      • How to measure the value created by innovation
      • Dynamic capabilities for strategic innovation
      • Would a ‘Strategy Lab’ provide sustainable renewal of competitive advantage?
      • Design Thinking
      • China’s new model for Open Innovation
      • Penetrating the fog of Agile
      • The resurgence of frugal innovation
      • Impact of digital technologies
    • Key Conference Tracks
      • Business model innovation
      • Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems and platforms
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Sustainable Innovation
    • Innovation Leadership
  • RADMA
    • About RADMA
    • R&D Project Exchange
    • Celebrating 40 Years of RADMA
    • RADMA Scholars
    • R&D Management Journal
  • The Pentathlon Framework
    • Strategy
    • Ideas
    • Selection & Prioritisation
    • Implementation
    • People & Organisations
  • Knowledge Hub
  • R&D Management Conference
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Events Archive
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • About R&D Today
    • Contributors
    • R&D Publications
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Themes
    • R&D Management
      • Rationale for key themes
      • Ideation and creativity in R&D
      • Managing international R&D
      • Managing the R&D pipeline
      • Open Innovation
      • Roadmapping
      • Technology Strategy
    • Special Features
      • Innovation for a Sustainable Future
      • How to measure the value created by innovation
      • Dynamic capabilities for strategic innovation
      • Would a ‘Strategy Lab’ provide sustainable renewal of competitive advantage?
      • Design Thinking
      • China’s new model for Open Innovation
      • Penetrating the fog of Agile
      • The resurgence of frugal innovation
      • Impact of digital technologies
    • Key Conference Tracks
      • Business model innovation
      • Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems and platforms
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Sustainable Innovation
    • Innovation Leadership
  • RADMA
    • About RADMA
    • R&D Project Exchange
    • Celebrating 40 Years of RADMA
    • RADMA Scholars
    • R&D Management Journal
  • The Pentathlon Framework
    • Strategy
    • Ideas
    • Selection & Prioritisation
    • Implementation
    • People & Organisations
  • Knowledge Hub
  • R&D Management Conference
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Events Archive
  • Contact

Menu

What is the best platform orchestration strategy?

Platform-based businesses, such as eBay, AirBnB and Deliveroo, have become increasingly important in the economy, but little research has been done into the impact of different platform orchestration strategies for managing social and interpersonal interaction with the platform.

Xia Han’s PhD aimed to fill these research gaps through an analysis of the platform orchestration processes of the top four used car trading platforms in China.

We asked him about the implications of his research The Dynamics of Digital Platform Orchestration: Unfolding the Institutional Logics Shifts and Fields Restructuring in the Chinese Used Car Market, which was supported by RADMA. 

Xia Han

Platform orchestration strategies

Originally the concept of a ‘platform’ was a description of an enabling technology, but now it has expanded to include the provision of business services.

Digital platforms compete against each other; some become successful while others fade away. The determinators of success are multi-faceted and extend beyond the control of the platform owner, however the platform can be ‘orchestrated’ through its design and facilitation of the interactions between the participants to increase its efficiency and attractiveness.

Platform-based businesses that link supply-side and demand-side customers have gained increasingly larger shares of the economy. As the value of a platform is centred around its installed base, getting initial customers onboard the platform is a critical issue. However, there have been few studies of social and interpersonal aspect of platform orchestration.

Xia Han’s PhD aimed to fill these research gaps through an analysis of the platform orchestration processes of the top four used car trading platforms in China.

The research proposed a theoretical framework using institutional logic and field theory to examine the platform orchestration process.

Three platform orchestration strategies were theorised:

  • Adherence – the platform can choose to adhere to the existing institutional logic, such as historical practices, assumptions, values and beliefs.
  • Leverage – the platform can leverage the power structure of the targeted market by forging alliances with incumbent players who are not direct participants of the platform.
  • Bypass – a platform can bypass the existing constraints of the market by differentiating itself from the industry to appeal to end customers’ stigmas.

Interestingly, analysis of the strategies of the car trading platforms revealed that choice of platforms is not a direct economic or rational choice by the interested party, but more as a result of a sense-making through institutional logics.

The research also resolved the long-standing “causality paradox” in the platform literature, which inaccurately assumes advantage of first-mover platform would perpetually gain more customers given the exponential value generated by its growing network.

This research proposes a new research agenda focusing on institutional logics to understand the dynamics of platform orchestration process, and fills the research gaps in several areas. It can facilitate firms to choose the appropriate strategy to orchestrate platform ecosystems.

We asked Xia more about his findings.

You studied four used car trading platforms – did all these platforms share similar technology or were there differences in the functionality and usability?

The essence of technology behind these digital platforms are similar. The core function of these platforms is to link used car buyers and sellers. This function can be achieved through a simple website or mobile app using existing mature technology.

The platforms facilitate these trades between used car sellers and buyers by providing an easily quantifiable inspection report, which certain level of transparency of the conditions of these vehicles. Within these reports, the damages from small scratches to structural deformation are all clearly identified. Some platforms chose more technologically advanced method such as standardized vehicle damage inspection systems with proprietary tools, and others relied on the experience of the platforms’ employees (inspectors).

My research shows that technologically more advanced solution does not necessarily give a platform a competitive edge. The core competitive advantage of a platform comes from one’s ability to attract and serve customers. The technology used to achieve these goals can be substituted by means such as rapid expansion of inspector network, financial guarantee of used car conditions, and most importantly, reaching a larger customer base.

You identified three orchestration strategies – was one found to be more successful than the others? How did you measure the relative success?

Each of these strategies is a success within their own time frame.

At the early stage, when customers are not yet familiar with the platform concept, strategy 1 Adherence is more applicable. Helping customers make sense of the platform’s business model is most critical.

Whereas strategy 2 Leverage works best at a growth stage of the platform market. Involving other important actors, who are not the direct participants of the platform transactions, which were previously ignored by the incumbent platform, can create opportunity to “dethrone” the dominant platform.

Finally, the third strategy Bypass,  works best when the market competition is fierce within the existing scope. This strategy suggests expanding the market to a larger and underserved customer base. In my research, the individual customers consist of this previously underserved market. However, this strategy requires exponentially more resources to succeed.

From a distance, strategy 3 looks like a competition of the size of a platform’s pocket size. Hence, the platform firm’s ability to raise capital is critical.

The industry usually looks at a few metrics to determine the “success” of a platform. These metrics include transaction volume, daily active user, and market share. But overall, the consensus is looking at the market size captured by a given platform. These metrics can provide a snapshot of a platform’s performance at a given point of time.

You say that the ‘first mover advantage’ did not result in long term success – what was the biggest factor in determining the long term success?

First mover advantage is highly regarded within the platform research community. Because a platform’s value is determined by the number of customers within the existing network. It is natural for a used car buyer to choose the platform with the largest variety of vehicles at a competitive price. And the larger number of available buyers would increase the likelihood of a used car seller to reach a deal quicker. Hence, more sellers would be attracted to this platform. Therefore, it makes sense that the first mover to be the one capturing the largest market first.

However, as my research shows, the first mover did not hold their dominant position for long. The latecomers managed to capture even larger market share.

The most important factor for a platform to succeed would be the ability to continuous harness its business ecosystem, or in a more academic term, the platform’s related “fields”. A platform should not only focus on its immediate participants, but also identify and deal with threats from external parties. For example, in my case studies, the automotive manufacturers, who do not participate the used car platforms directly, but control the used car policies of their dealerships, are one of such parties that diminished the value of the first mover advantage. The upcoming platform partnered with the major automotive manufacturers and severely damaged the supply channel of the incumbent used car platform.

 

About Xia Han

Xia Han is currently a Lecturer at Brunel Business School and a member of the Operations and Information System Management Research Group. He completed his PhD under the supervision of Dr Veronica Martinez and Prof. Andy Neely at the Cambridge Service Alliance.

His PhD research: The Dynamics of Digital Platform Orchestration: Unfolding the Institutional Logics Shifts and Fields Restructuring in the Chinese Used Car Market, was supported by RADMA.

  • 25 May 2021
View our newsletter archive
  • Related posts

    • Scaling the sharing economy – how Airbnb became a global brand
    • Doctoral Studies Awards 2015/16
  • Have your say

    Have your say / Follow us

    Linkedin Soundcloud Twitter Youtube Linkedin-in

    R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

    Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and
     click here to view our newsletter archive.

    © Copyright R&D Today

    2025.

    All rights reserved.