Skip to content
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
  • Home
  • About
    • About R&D Today
    • Contributors
    • R&D Publications
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Themes
    • R&D Management
      • Rationale for key themes
      • Ideation and creativity in R&D
      • Managing international R&D
      • Managing the R&D pipeline
      • Open Innovation
      • Roadmapping
      • Technology Strategy
    • Special Features
      • Innovation for a Sustainable Future
      • How to measure the value created by innovation
      • Dynamic capabilities for strategic innovation
      • Would a ‘Strategy Lab’ provide sustainable renewal of competitive advantage?
      • Design Thinking
      • China’s new model for Open Innovation
      • Penetrating the fog of Agile
      • The resurgence of frugal innovation
      • Impact of digital technologies
    • Key Conference Tracks
      • Business model innovation
      • Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems and platforms
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Sustainable Innovation
    • Innovation Leadership
  • RADMA
    • About RADMA
    • R&D Project Exchange
    • Celebrating 40 Years of RADMA
    • RADMA Scholars
    • R&D Management Journal
  • The Pentathlon Framework
    • Strategy
    • Ideas
    • Selection & Prioritisation
    • Implementation
    • People & Organisations
  • Knowledge Hub
  • R&D Management Conference
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Events Archive
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • About R&D Today
    • Contributors
    • R&D Publications
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Themes
    • R&D Management
      • Rationale for key themes
      • Ideation and creativity in R&D
      • Managing international R&D
      • Managing the R&D pipeline
      • Open Innovation
      • Roadmapping
      • Technology Strategy
    • Special Features
      • Innovation for a Sustainable Future
      • How to measure the value created by innovation
      • Dynamic capabilities for strategic innovation
      • Would a ‘Strategy Lab’ provide sustainable renewal of competitive advantage?
      • Design Thinking
      • China’s new model for Open Innovation
      • Penetrating the fog of Agile
      • The resurgence of frugal innovation
      • Impact of digital technologies
    • Key Conference Tracks
      • Business model innovation
      • Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems and platforms
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Sustainable Innovation
    • Innovation Leadership
  • RADMA
    • About RADMA
    • R&D Project Exchange
    • Celebrating 40 Years of RADMA
    • RADMA Scholars
    • R&D Management Journal
  • The Pentathlon Framework
    • Strategy
    • Ideas
    • Selection & Prioritisation
    • Implementation
    • People & Organisations
  • Knowledge Hub
  • R&D Management Conference
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Events Archive
  • Contact

Menu

Crowdsourcing without profit: How to implement ‘Open Social Innovation’

Krithika Randhawa
Krithika Randhawa, University of Technology Sydney

Open innovation has emerged as a novel way for organizations to innovate by collaborating with external stakeholders.

One contemporary application of open innovation is crowdsourcing by which organizations (seekers) engage with an external crowd of potential solvers to obtain innovative ideas and solutions.

Citizensourcing to address societal problems

In this research, we study the use of open innovation by public sector organizations to achieve societal benefits. Our focus is on government agencies that crowdsource from citizens to drive open social innovation, and thus develop new ways to address societal problems – a process also termed ‘citizensourcing’.

Analysing rich data from 18 local governments’ citizensourcing activities, we found that these organizations varied dramatically in their degree of commitment, and thus their strategies for organizing and managing crowdsourcing efforts. This translated into varying levels of seeker engagement and outcomes.

Note: ***** = high; * = low

Different levels of engagement:

  • Achieving results – the most engaged organizations seek to achieve transformational outcomes for the community and society, and commit the necessary resources and processes for crowdsourcing.
  • Symbolic engagement  – others viewing crowdsourcing as a way to signal to community members that they have a voice in decision-making.
  • Satisfy a regulatory mandate –  others made minimal efforts, in this case, citizen involvement is only a way to achieve legitimacy of government decisions rather than co-creating innovative services.

More generally, this shows that the decision to initiate crowdsourcing is necessary but not sufficient for organizations to benefit from the “wisdom of crowds” as advocated by prior research. Based on our findings, we developed a model showing how organizations can crowdsource open (social) innovation.

Krithika Randhawa - crowdsourcing outcomesA model for effective social innovation

Successful crowdsourcing effort begins with the seeker organizations’ intent, reflected in the top management team’s commitment, which shaped the organizational goals. This in turn influences crowdsourcing strategy formulation and implementation. Such a robust engagement strategy enhances the capability of project teams to implement crowdsourcing.

Teams with higher project capabilities tend to implement more strategic projects, using a richer range of platform tools and more transparent communication processes, thereby producing more successful crowdsourcing project outcomes.

Besides project team capability, project implementation also depends on team motivation to proactively implement crowdsourcing: when organizational intent is well-articulated by the senior leadership, employees are more motivated, which translates into better crowdsourcing project activities, and ultimately better outcomes. Overall, our results highlight how organizational factors shape the project-level implementation and outcomes of crowdsourcing.

Our insights also allowed us to compare and contrast governmental crowdsourcing with those used by for-profit firms to develop a framework of crowdsourcing modes.

Krithika Randhawa - crowdsourcing modesComparing governmental and non-government approaches 

The non-pecuniary, societal goals of citizensourcing mean that the motive of government crowdsourcing is fundamentally different from the commercial motives of corporate crowdsourcing. Yet, in the nature of the solver interactions, we find that citizensourcing resembles a corporate-sponsored community.

Unlike the crowd seen in corporate crowdsourcing contests, the solvers (citizens) in our sample are brought together by a shared purpose, social identity and peer-to-peer interactions.  Hence, they exhibit attributes of a brand community such as those sponsored by BMW or Nike to co-create with customers and  reinforce their respective offline loyalties and purchase behaviors.

This hybrid use of virtual and offline relationships offer parallels to that of local governments, who often combine online and face-to-face interactions. Similar to brand communities, governments also seek customer (citizen) knowledge to incorporate in their service delivery and strategy planning process, and seek out local contributors motivated by intrinsic, pro-social motive to contribute to community and societal welfare. On the other hand, firms usually use crowdsourcing contests to find a solution to specific R&D or technical problems, and motivate their solvers through awards or extrinsic incentives.

More generally, we show how seeker organizational factors and choices shape project-level implementation and success of crowdsourcing efforts, as well as provide insights for open innovation activities of other smaller, geographically-bound organizations.

This article is a summary of Krithika Randhawa Ralf Wilden Joel West  Crowdsourcing without profit: the role of the seeker in open social innovation  which appears within a special issue of R&D Management. 

For more details or information, do not hesitate to contact Krithika Randhawa:

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @krandhawa

  • 7 June 2019
View our newsletter archive
  • Related posts

    • Why successful digital healthcare innovation needs more than great technology
    • First R&D Management Workshop 2024 for researchers in Oceania
    • Crowdsourcing innovation – what potential contributors should consider
    • Design thinking to achieve ambidextrous innovation management
    • Are female solvers an undervalued resource in crowdsourcing?
    • Leveraging Open Innovation for societal impact – an R&D Management special issue
  • Have your say

    Have your say / Follow us

    Linkedin Soundcloud Twitter Youtube Linkedin-in

    R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

    Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and
     click here to view our newsletter archive.

    © Copyright R&D Today

    2025.

    All rights reserved.