logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Technology strategy
    • Open innovation
    • Roadmapping
    • Managing international R&D
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
  • Tools
  • News
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Technology strategy
    • Open innovation
    • Roadmapping
    • Managing international R&D
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
  • Tools
  • News
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

Overcoming the Global Innovation Trade-Off

RADMA CLOUDFor their global innovation strategies, many companies have long relied on their ability to assemble people with key capabilities and critical knowledge. This is typically done through co-location: bringing together designers, engineers, technologists, and other creative thinkers in a few innovation centres at home and in lead markets. The new products and services they create are then disseminated to markets across the world.

However, as the range of knowledge required for global innovation becomes wide and more varied, co-location is no longer sufficient.

This paper argues that the reason for this failure is due to the commonly accepted trade-off between complexity and dispersion. The challenge is to overcome this trade-off: to build a worldwide R&D team that can master the complexities of robust innovation. Having researched more than 50 global companies, Doz and Wilson believe that innovation practice can be redesigned to enable far-flung people to work together on complex ideas.

This transition can be made by optimizing three different aspects of innovation, generally at once:

1. A compact and agile innovation footprint – helping to find and access new sources of market, process, or technical knowledge, and easily disengage from obsolete sources.

2. Develop the capabilities, processes, culture and structures needed to support rich communication – when innovators are separated by distance, time, and culture, communication becomes a serious challenge.

3. Boost support for collaboration in innovative projects, both internally and with external partners. It is explained that innovation doesn’t have to be constrained to the complexity–dispersion curve.

Implementing the necessary changes is challenging and can take time — but it is one of the best ways to position an innovative company for competitive advantage in the future.

 

Read the full paper:

Overcoming the Global Innovation Trade-Off, Yves Doz and Keeley Wilson, Strategy+Business (Booz & Company), 2012

Recommended by Dr Allison Haitz, post by R&D Today admin

Allison Haitzglobal innovationKeeley WilsonYves Doz
Previous PostIntegrating TRIZ into technology push oriente...
Next PostTowards an integrated framework for managing ...
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
Theme Editor Blogs
  • International R&D podcast 3: Equilibrium, academics and policies
  • International R&D podcast 2: Management, Leadership and Balance
  • International R&D podcast: cultures and clock speeds
Resources
  • Innovation Management: Learning for the experiences of companies in European countries
  • Managing for Innovation – online course with Leeds University Business School and IBM
  • Top 20 Innovation Blogs of 2016
Tools
  • Kano model of product or service features 2
    Improving Product Features: When is More Less?
    Different types of feature have different effects on customer satisfaction - analysis by Quality...
  • Innovation Fitness Test - a tool to help scoring
    John Bessant recommends this tool developed by colleagues in Canada which helps with using...
  • Frugal Innovation Index
    Frugal innovation - competitive advantage when resources are limited
    Frugal innovation allows a company with a quality product to compete effectively with cheaper...
  • Paired comparison
    Techniques for Effective Prioritisation
    Gut feeling may be a valid basis for making decisions about your personal life...
  • portfolio tools
    Portfolio management tools and approaches
    The aim of portfolio management is to ensure that a sensible set of innovation...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.