logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

Tool Fingerprinting: Characterising Management Tools

Management tools and techniques such as roadmapping, portfolio management methods and scenario planning are considered useful for a variety of business issues.

Practitioners are confused by the increasing number of management tools and techniques available as scholars, managers and consultants develop ever newer ways to support firms.

Academics have long been interested in understanding the nature of management tools and to derive guidance on how they should be used – a typical approach has been proposing rules and classifications, however none are universally recognised.

The trouble is that everyone has a different view of what tools are and what they could or could not do. There is not yet a map to help practitioners identify tools which could be integrated to create toolkits. There is a need for a more stable platform to treat management tools so that opportunities to configure and combine as well as integrate methods might become easier and to help practitioners with the configuration of toolkits (e.g. how do we know whether we have covered all that is needed? How do we know whether the current configuration of this roadmap is exhaustive? What other tools do we need/we could to add? How should we configure them?).

This paper proposes a map, derived from the characterisations of instances of tools implementation, according to five key dimensions which can help design and understand toolkits whilst in action.

These five dimensions are:

  1.  Application Domain
  2. Functions
  3. Implementation Techniques
  4. Business Aspects Considered
  5. Implementation metrics.

For each dimension, the paper describes the possible variations (for example, the implementation techniques of tools vary from workshop-based to interviews, to numerical simulations, modelling, role-playing, statistical analysis etc…) and shows how a toolkit could be fingerprinted.

A route is proposed in the paper which has its roots in the concept of ‘family resemblances.’ Accordingly five dimensions are derived from the analysis of extant literature which, the authors argue, provide the basis for a ‘general’ template for the analysis of each individual ‘tool-in-action’ which could help both practitioners in the configuration in the management tools/toolkits and academics in the analysis of trends in their use.

The new proposed approach is introduced and applied to an existing toolkit to show how this characterisation scheme can be employed both to assess existing tools and toolkits and to identify ways to improve and complement them with other tools.

The authors say: “We think this approach can also be particularly helpful for practitioners. By using the tool-in-action approach, discussions could be avoided regarding what is meant by the words ‘roadmapping’ or ‘portfolio management’.

“Similarly, speculations and assumptions with regards to what tools are meant to do could be avoided. Clearly seeing the fingerprint of each tool provides strong foundation for configuring and planning of toolkits and for communicating their benefits and characteristics.”

The paper concludes by reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of this approach for researchers and managers and areas for future research.

Taken from Tool Fingerprinting: Characterising Management Tools by L Mortara, R Phaal, C Kerr, C Farrukh and D Probert, Centre for Technology Management, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge.

characterising management toolsClare FarrukhClive KerrDavid Probertinnovation management toolsRob Phaal
Previous PostDirect coaching supports SMEs with inbound kn...
Next PostAssessing innovation and technology managemen...
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
View our newsletter archive
Theme Editor Blogs
  • Digital disruption in the lab: The case for R&D digitalization in chemicals – a review
  • Accelerating product development: the tools you need now – a review
  • Using good practice R&D management to create new innovations in malodour control
Associated Papers
  • Developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits – a review
  • Technology roadmapping – a framework for evolution and revolution – a review
  • Business Appraisal of Technology Potentials – development of a practical approach to valuing technology
Resources
  • Innovation Management: Learning for the experiences of companies in European countries
  • How to write and publish your research
  • Top 20 Innovation Blogs of 2016
Related Posts
  • Portfolio management tools and approaches
  • Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
  • Must read papers on aspects of R&D Management
Tools
  • Most useful R&D Management tools survey
    Most useful tools for R&D Management
    Ask which are the most useful tools for R&D Management and you will find...
  • Kano model of product or service features 2
    Improving Product Features: When is More Less?
    Different types of feature have different effects on customer satisfaction - analysis by Quality...
  • Green Check Your Idea
    “Green Check Your Idea” – assess the environmental impact of innovation ideas
    The Green Check Your Idea tool helps innovation managers prepare an initial assessment of...
  • Radar-Roadmap-feat
    The Halo-Effect: Creating Impact Through “Good-looking“ Roadmaps
    Content is the essence of roadmapping. But the impact of impressive, professional visuals that...
  • Paul Barrett
    Tools support objective discussion of portfolio strategy
    Paul Barrett is part of a RADMA working group providing a selection of recommended...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.