logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

How to identify disruptive technologies

How can you assess the potential of a new technology to be a disruptive force?

Disruptive technologiesResearchers Stoiciu et al examine disruptive technologies within the context of innovation management and how the theory of disruption first introduced by Christensen (1997) may apply to companies in practice.

The core objective of their paper is to provide a practical assessment framework that can be used to assess the potential for technologies to be disruptive. This framework was validated against five renewable energy technologies to provide an index for disruptiveness.

The assessment framework is underpinned by eleven disruptiveness criteria across six categories (A-F). These were developed from a combination of literature and consultation with energy experts.

Each technology being assessed is scored on a scale of 1-5 against every criterion, with 1 fully sustaining (innovative but not disruptive), 5  fully disruptive and 3  the disruptiveness threshold.

The scoring is semi-quantitative in nature, and is based on a combination of desk research and expert interviews to reduce subjectivity in the scoring. The overall degree of disruptiveness is calculated as an average of all the disruptive measurements, with all the criteria being equally weighted.

Categories

A. Market share development: the two factors of current and the future estimated market share (e.g. at 20 years) together provide an indication of scalability of the technology. The higher the scalability, the more likely the technology will be disruptive.

1. Current market share
2. Estimated market share

B. Value proposition: this provides an indication of the level of value latent in the technology. Disruptive technologies are expected to bring new value propositions to the market.

3. Superior value proposition

C. Costs: a comparison of initial and maintenance costs between the new technology and the existing alternative.

4. Initial costs
5. Maintenance costs

D. Time to market: this is a measure of the technology readiness. The closer the technology is to being fully commercial, the higher its potential to be disruptive.

6. Stage of development

E. Barriers: these provide a measure of the various obstacles that the technology and its adoption face. The higher these are, the less likely it is for the technology to become disruptive.

7. Technological
8. Economic and financial
9. Political and legal
10. Social barriers

F. Learning rate: this is measured by considering improvements in performance and costs savings (i.e. improved efficiency) through the years of the technology’s development.

11. Potential learning rate

While this framework was developed primarily for use with new energy technologies, the criteria applied would appear to be extensible to other industries and their new technologies.

The full version of this paper can be found at http://epub.wu.ac.at/4310/

(Assessing the Disruptiveness of New Energy Technologies – An Ex-Ante Perspective, Institute for Strategic Management, Energy & Strategy Think Tank, Stoiciu et al (2014))

Written by Dr Imoh Ilevbare for R&D Today
Product Manager (Innovation and Technology Management Services) at Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge

technology strategy
Previous PostAssessing the viability of emerging disruptiv...
Next PostRoadmapping facilitates strategic dialogue
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
View our newsletter archive
Theme Editor Blogs
  • Digital disruption in the lab: The case for R&D digitalization in chemicals – a review
  • Accelerating product development: the tools you need now – a review
  • Using good practice R&D management to create new innovations in malodour control
Associated Papers
  • Breaking the mold – using the power of convergence to accelerate growth – a review
  • Selling technological knowledge: managing the complexities of technology transactions
Resources
  • Transferring new ideas from research to practice
  • Technology acquisitions: A guided approach to technology acquisitions and protection decisions
  • A guided approach to technology acquisitions and protection decision
Related Posts
  • Product technology roadmapping – a visual framework for ‘sense making’ in a changing world
  • Innovation for sustainability what is needed to fulfil such a role?
  • Working with the best people is more important than employing them
Tools
  • Green Check Your Idea
    “Green Check Your Idea” – assess the environmental impact of innovation ideas
    The Green Check Your Idea tool helps innovation managers prepare an initial assessment of...
  • Paired comparison
    Techniques for Effective Prioritisation
    Gut feeling may be a valid basis for making decisions about your personal life...
  • portfolio tools
    Portfolio management tools and approaches
    The aim of portfolio management is to ensure that a sensible set of innovation...
  • FEMA
    Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
    To fail fast can save enormous waste later in the product lifecycle. Failure Mode...
  • 'How to' statements
    A useful tool in creative problem solving is the ‘how to’ statement which provides...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.