logologologo
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Guide for contributors
  • Themes
    • Roadmapping
    • Open Innovation
    • Managing the R&D pipeline
    • Technology Strategy
    • Managing international R&D
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Impact of digital technologies
    • The resurgence of frugal innovation
    • Design Thinking
    • Penetrating the fog of Agile
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a new model for Open Innovation
  • Tools
  • News
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Resources
  • Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Events
  • R&D Conference
  • Contact

Valuing and comparing small portfolios

Technology-based projects will often face large uncertainties about costs and timescales– with some being terminated before they have even made any money. Many of the tools used in valuing and selecting projects are only really applicable to large portfolios because they assess value by using statistical concepts such as probability, mean and risk. This article, by Rick Mitchell, Francis Hunt and David Probert, examines how to choose small portfolios of projects without using invalid statistical measures.

riskThe issues addressed in the article are:

  • How best to characterise risk and reward when considering only a very small number of projects – where statistical concepts such as average, probability or variance are of no great value;
  • How to compare and contrast the values of a small number of projects with different levels of risk and return;
  • How to select an optimum small portfolio of risky projects on a rational basis without using a subjective balancing of risk and reward.

The authors say that their approach to these issues is simple and logical – but that it does require a rethinking of what risk and return really mean for single projects and small portfolios.

 

Read the full paper:

Valuing and comparing small portfolios, Rick Mitchell, Francis Hunt and David Probert, Research and Technology Management (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group), 2010

Recommended by Rick Mitchell, post by R&D Today admin

David ProbertManaging the R&D pipelineRick Mitchelltechnology portfolios
Previous PostUsing the game 'Top Trumps' as a communicatio...
Next PostInnovation Fitness Test - a tool to help scor...
Search R&D Today
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
View our newsletter archive
Theme Editor Blogs
  • Loading and Turbulence in R&D: Is there a Reynolds Number?
  • Seduction and persuasion – Intuitive v. analytical thinking in technology management
  • Analytical or Intuitive – finding a sweet spot for strategic thinking
Associated Papers
  • Business Appraisal of Technology Potentials – development of a practical approach to valuing technology
  • A review of TRIZ its benefits and challenges in practice
  • Tool Fingerprinting: Characterising Management Tools
Resources
  • Portfolio management at GlaxoSmithKline
  • Technology acquisitions: A guided approach to technology acquisitions and protection decisions
  • Portfolio Management techniques
Related Posts
  • Crowdsourcing innovation – what potential contributors should consider
  • Portfolio management tools and approaches
  • Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Tools
  • Would an analogy help?
    nalogies are a useful tool for creative problem solving, to help one move away...
  • Creating compelling objectives to deliver strategic growth platforms
    Leaders want their teams to think beyond the day-to-day and create thriving visions for...
  • Absorptive Capacity Audit
    Absorptive Capacity Audit
    Utilising this audit, the reader can assess the strengths and weaknesses in their ability...
  • portfolio tools
    Portfolio management tools and approaches
    The aim of portfolio management is to ensure that a sensible set of innovation...
  • 'How to' statements
    A useful tool in creative problem solving is the ‘how to’ statement which provides...
Have Your Say…

Have Your Say / Follow Us

R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and click here to view our newsletter archive.

Copyright R&D Today 2020. All rights reserved.