Skip to content
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Article Type
Papers
Events
Tools
Funding Articles
Case Studies
Resources
Opportunities
Theme Editor Blogs
Filter by Categories
Business model innovation
Ideation and creativity in R&D
Latest news
Managing international R&D
Managing technology platforms
Managing the R&D pipeline
Open innovation
Outsourcing R&D
Project valuation and selection
R&D strategy
Roadmapping
Stage gate processes
Technology intelligence
  • Home
  • About
    • About R&D Today
    • Contributors
    • R&D Publications
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Themes
    • R&D Management
      • Rationale for key themes
      • Ideation and creativity in R&D
      • Managing international R&D
      • Managing the R&D pipeline
      • Open Innovation
      • Roadmapping
      • Technology Strategy
    • Special Features
      • Innovation for a Sustainable Future
      • How to measure the value created by innovation
      • Dynamic capabilities for strategic innovation
      • Would a ‘Strategy Lab’ provide sustainable renewal of competitive advantage?
      • Design Thinking
      • China’s new model for Open Innovation
      • Penetrating the fog of Agile
      • The resurgence of frugal innovation
      • Impact of digital technologies
    • Key Conference Tracks
      • Business model innovation
      • Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems and platforms
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Sustainable Innovation
    • Innovation Leadership
  • RADMA
    • About RADMA
    • R&D Project Exchange
    • Celebrating 40 Years of RADMA
    • RADMA Scholars
    • R&D Management Journal
  • The Pentathlon Framework
    • Strategy
    • Ideas
    • Selection & Prioritisation
    • Implementation
    • People & Organisations
  • Knowledge Hub
  • R&D Management Conference
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Events Archive
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • About R&D Today
    • Contributors
    • R&D Publications
    • R&D Today newsletter archive
  • Themes
    • R&D Management
      • Rationale for key themes
      • Ideation and creativity in R&D
      • Managing international R&D
      • Managing the R&D pipeline
      • Open Innovation
      • Roadmapping
      • Technology Strategy
    • Special Features
      • Innovation for a Sustainable Future
      • How to measure the value created by innovation
      • Dynamic capabilities for strategic innovation
      • Would a ‘Strategy Lab’ provide sustainable renewal of competitive advantage?
      • Design Thinking
      • China’s new model for Open Innovation
      • Penetrating the fog of Agile
      • The resurgence of frugal innovation
      • Impact of digital technologies
    • Key Conference Tracks
      • Business model innovation
      • Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems and platforms
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Sustainable Innovation
    • Innovation Leadership
  • RADMA
    • About RADMA
    • R&D Project Exchange
    • Celebrating 40 Years of RADMA
    • RADMA Scholars
    • R&D Management Journal
  • The Pentathlon Framework
    • Strategy
    • Ideas
    • Selection & Prioritisation
    • Implementation
    • People & Organisations
  • Knowledge Hub
  • R&D Management Conference
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Events Archive
  • Contact

Menu

Would an analogy help?

Analogies are a useful tool for creative problem solving, to help one move away from the obvious and to encourage ‘out of the box’ thinking. Professor John Bessant shares his views on this interesting tool.

An analogy is when we say that something is like something else. It doesn’t mean that it is the same as that other thing but rather that it shares some characteristic. If we say that ‘he is like a bulldog’ when referring to a colleague at work we don’t mean he is a dog, all teeth and slavering mouth, but rather that he shares the properties of being tenacious, not letting go, going after something with a fixed sense of purpose.

If we are trying to generate new ideas around a problem analogies give us some fresh insights. Asking questions like ‘what else is like this problem?’ or ‘where have I seen something like this before?’ can lead us to some new thinking space.

An analogy focuses on relationships between items. Things are, or seem to be, analogous when they have certain communal characteristics and at the same time differ in other aspects. Thus, if we are looking for an analogy between two entities, we concentrate on the properties they have in common: the ‘analogy base’. For example, when looking for an analogy for a book we tend to concentrate on its function as a printed information carrier — a newspaper or magazine are the most obvious analogies.

Using an analogy provocatively is very different from explaining something by analogy. Analogies are used to force us to look at a situation in a fresh way and generate further ideas. So it is essential to look for analogies between elements that have apparently nothing to do with one another. This technique can be used in group settings (e.g. incorporated into a brainstorming session) as well as for individual problem solving.

Let’s look at two variants, the direct analogy and the personal analogy.

The technique of direct analogy or analogy from nature is based on the idea that every problem, however big or small, has already been solved in some way by nature. It is up to man to discover that solution and use it in the problem context. Nature is used here in its widest sense: everything that surrounds us and of which we are a part. There are many examples of inventions that have their origin in nature and the field of ‘biomimetics’ is growing fast.

For example, the sonar has been used for centuries by bats and whales; piddocks, (a kind of mussel), inspired Black & Decker engineers; the eyes of a cat gave us the reflector or cat’s eye.

Two further points should be noted. First, when choosing an analogon make sure that it stimulates the imagination and that you know a lot about it — there is no point applying the technique if you can only list two or three properties that are very general.

Second, in the force-fit phase proceed methodically; no properties should be omitted because they are not inspiring at first sight. A little bit of frustration can help us to transcend bigger mind sets.

Phases in the technique of provocative use of analogies

  • Phase 1 Getting a grip on the problem – briefing/questions/answers. Shed the known (first obvious ideas). Logically re-define the problem in one sentence. Select one crucial concrete term which becomes the subject.
  • Phase 2 Phase of alienation – choose an analogy from nature in its widest sense. Establish an analogy base between subject and analogon. Make a list of properties of the analogon that are not in the analogy base.
  • Phase 3 Force-fit – force-fit each of the properties back to the original problem.

Personal analogy

In the personal analogy one substitutes oneself for the crucial term of the problem (X) by asking the question ‘How would I feel and how would I react (from that feeling) if I was X in situation Y (Y being the situation belonging to the problem context). Imagination as well as emotion play a principal role in this kind of analogy. It is therefore important to try and arouse intense emotions and express the reactions in vivid images. The answers will subsequently be force-fitted back to the original problem situation to provoke a solution or a new viewpoint.

clay pigeon analogyAn example of personal analogy

A group of boys made a clay pigeon field at the end of their village. If they did not hit the clay pigeons these flew far in to a neighbouring field. The boys wanted to get the clay pigeons back because they are expensive, but damaged the corn doing so.

The owner of the field complained to their parents about this and the result was that the boys would have to look for a new hobby. All logical approaches to the problem failed, until they used the personal analogy. “How would I feel if I were a clay pigeon flying into the corn field of an angry farmer and what would I do?” “I would feel guilty and would want the ground to open up and swallow me”, was one of the answers.

Making a force-fit to the original problem the question became “What makes that clay pigeon get swallowed up?” One of the suggestions was “making your own clay pigeons from fertilizer”, which would also benefit the farmer. The most elegant answer, however, was to make your own clay pigeons from ice. After some testing the boys made ice pigeons from a mixture of water and milk, solving the problem with the farmer and at the same time saving money.

With thanks to Professor John Bessant. www.innovation-portal

  • 25 January 2016
View our newsletter archive
  • Related posts

    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • Are these the best (or worst) festive inventions?
    • Can creativity help a company survive in turbulent times?
    • Make time for re-creation
    • Why am I losing staff? The power of inner drivers
    • The low carbon transition can stimulate innovation
    • How to speak up without damaging your career
    • Kids deserve creativity – and so do employers
    • Innovation deficit at heart of Europe’s slow growth
    • Ideation and creativity in R&D
    • How distortions and deceptions impact the creation of technology strategy
    • Brexit as an innovation challenge
  • Have your say

    Have your say / Follow us

    Linkedin Soundcloud Twitter Youtube Linkedin-in

    R&D Today is the outreach site for the Research and Development Management Association, a charitable organisation that supports research, best practice and innovation.  www.radma.net

    Click here to sign up to our newsletter, and
     click here to view our newsletter archive.

    © Copyright R&D Today

    2025.

    All rights reserved.